From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
353 N.C. 275 (N.C. 2000)

Summary

holding that an indictment was sufficient where, at the top of the indictment, "State of North Carolina" appeared with "Carteret County" and, in the body of the indictment, Carteret County was listed as the locale of the predicate felony convictions

Summary of this case from STATE v. IVEY

Opinion

2000


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
353 N.C. 275 (N.C. 2000)

holding that an indictment was sufficient where, at the top of the indictment, "State of North Carolina" appeared with "Carteret County" and, in the body of the indictment, Carteret County was listed as the locale of the predicate felony convictions

Summary of this case from STATE v. IVEY

relying on State v. Taylor, 79 N.C. App. 635, 339 S.E.2d 859, disc. review denied, 317 N.C. 340, 346 S.E.2d 146, which held that counsel's complete silence at a sentencing hearing does not constitute ineffective assistance

Summary of this case from State v. Slade
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 2000

Citations

353 N.C. 275 (N.C. 2000)
545 S.E.2d 744

Citing Cases

Statev. McNeil

Our caselaw permits a medical expert to testify that a person's injuries are inconsistent with the proffered…

State v. Wood

"[R]elief based upon such claims should be granted only when counsel's assistance is `so lacking that the…