From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiPaola v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 4, 1985
461 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Summary

In DiPaola v. State, 461 So.2d 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the Fourth District, citing to the schedule of lesser included offenses contained in the Florida Standard Jury Instructions (Criminal), held that the failure to instruct on possession of cocaine as a lesser included offense of trafficking in cocaine constituted reversible error.

Summary of this case from Munroe v. State

Opinion

No. 83-2102.

January 4, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Thomas M. Coker, Jr., J.

Channing E. Brackey and David R. Smith, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Teitler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Carlos Di Paola was charged by Information with trafficking in cocaine (Count I) and delivery of cocaine (Count II). He appeals his conviction of trafficking (Count I) and possession of cocaine (a lesser included offense of the charge of delivery of cocaine, Count II).

With one exception the matters complained of by appellant, Di Paola, either do not constitute error or the error, if any, was harmless.

Appellant correctly points out that the trial court failed to instruct the jury that it could find him guilty, as to Count I, of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine.

Possession of cocaine under Section 893.13(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1983), is a category 1 (one step removed) lesser included offense of trafficking in cocaine under Section 893.135(1)(b), Florida Statutes. Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.), p. 274.

Failure to give an instruction on the next immediate lesser included offense is per se reversible error. State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1978).

We disagree with the state's position that there was no evidence to support a finding of possession (which would implicate Rule 3.510(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure).

The conviction and sentence on Count II is affirmed. We reverse as to Count I and remand for new trial.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DiPaola v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 4, 1985
461 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

In DiPaola v. State, 461 So.2d 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the Fourth District, citing to the schedule of lesser included offenses contained in the Florida Standard Jury Instructions (Criminal), held that the failure to instruct on possession of cocaine as a lesser included offense of trafficking in cocaine constituted reversible error.

Summary of this case from Munroe v. State
Case details for

DiPaola v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS DiPAOLA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 4, 1985

Citations

461 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

State v. Daophin

We disapprove and quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. To the…

Smith v. State

We affirm the conviction and sentence on Count III, having determined that all points on appeal save one…