From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 31, 2001
797 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 4D00-3133.

October 31, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-4047CF10A.

Maury Halperin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Meredith L. Balo, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


We find one unpreserved error, but no fundamental error, in the prosecutor's closing argument. "A prosecutor's obligation is to secure justice, not victory at any cost." Cruse v. State, 522 So.2d 90, 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). However, this duty does not limit prosecutors' closing arguments to flat, robotic recitations of "just the facts." Closing argument "is a time for robust, vigorous, challenging . . . of an opponent's ideas." Norman v. Gloria Farms, Inc., 668 So.2d 1016, 1032 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (Farmer, J., dissenting). We have great confidence in the common sense of jurors to decide cases on the law and facts without being unduly swayed by the lawyers' oratory. A prosecutor does not violate her obligation to seek justice by arguing the state's case with passion and conviction.

On the remaining issue, appellant did not preserve his objections to the quality of the trial court's factual findings required by section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes (2000). Such error, if any, was not fundamental error. See Anderson v. State, 655 So.2d 1118, 1119 (Fla. 1995); State v. Townsend, 635 So.2d 949, 959 (Fla. 1994).

KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Diaz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 31, 2001
797 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Diaz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Angel DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 31, 2001

Citations

797 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Villella v. State

The prosecutor's comments convey the idea there was no evidence because there was no affair, when in fact the…

Tiszai v. United States

A prosecutor's closing argument is not limited to a "flat, robotic recitation[ ] of 'just the facts.' "…