From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 14, 1989
548 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-536.

September 14, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County; E.L. Eastmoore, Judge.

James William Devane, Lowell, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant's motion to correct sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The state concedes that the sentence should be corrected to reflect credit for time served on all counts for which the defendant was arrested and charged with on the same date. Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1986). The state also concedes that it was improper for the trial court to retain jurisdiction over the defendant's guidelines sentence. Hansbrough v. State, 509 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 1987). Defendant's third point on appeal, the extent of departure was previously reviewed by this court in the defendant's appeal after resentencing. We decline to reconsider this point.

We reverse and remand with instructions to correct the sentence in accordance with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Devane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 14, 1989
548 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Devane v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAM DEVANE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 14, 1989

Citations

548 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Raley v. State

We acknowledge that our case law has established that the improper retention of jurisdiction constitutes an…