holding that different treatment of comparable facts at different geographical locations within the state may or may not be a denial of equal privileges or immunities under Article I, section 20, depending on the policy choices involved
Summary of this case from Cox v. StateNo. 81-641.
November 30, 1981, October TERM, 1981.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 653 F. 2d 1208.
holding that different treatment of comparable facts at different geographical locations within the state may or may not be a denial of equal privileges or immunities under Article I, section 20, depending on the policy choices involved
Summary of this case from Cox v. Stateexplaining that even if defendant abandoned his state constitutional argument, the rationale underlying the "first things first" doctrine weighed in favor of considering such argument
Summary of this case from State v. Linkapplying that standard
Summary of this case from State v. GoacherFull title:DEPENDAHL ET AL. v. KALMANOVITZ
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 30, 1981
Or. Const. art. 1, § 20 was taken from Indiana's Constitution, which in turn was taken from Iowa's, which in…
Gale v. Dept. of RevenueVance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93, 97, 99 S Ct 939, 59 L Ed 2d 171 (1979); Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471,…