From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demetree v. Stramondo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 28, 1993
621 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2370.

June 25, 1993. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Johns County, Richard O. Watson, J.

Donna L.S. McIntosh and Frank C. Whigham of Stenstrom, McIntosh, Julian, Colbert, Whigham Simmons, P.A., Sanford, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Roger B. Butcher and Gus R. Benitez of Benitez Butcher, P.A., Orlando, for appellee/cross-appellant.


The final judgment is affirmed except to the extent that it denies the prevailing defendant below an alternative judgment. In a replevin action, where the plaintiff holds the property but the defendant prevails, the defendant is entitled to an election to recover possession of the property or to satisfy a judgment against the plaintiff and its surety for the value of the property and costs. See §§ 78.19, 78.20, 78.21, Fla. Stat. See e.g., State ex rel. O'Hara v. Justice, 109 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1959); Modine Manufacturing Co. v. Israel, 294 So.2d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 303 So.2d 644 (Fla. 1974); Cecil Holland Ford, Inc. v. Jameson, 132 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). We remand for entry of a corrected judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Demetree v. Stramondo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 28, 1993
621 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Demetree v. Stramondo

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DEMETREE, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. JACK STRAMONDO…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 28, 1993

Citations

621 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

In re Implementation of Committee on Privacy

Paragraph 3 of the form provides for damages for detention only against the defendant because the defendant's…

In re Implementation of Committee on Privacy

Paragraph 3 of the form provides for damages for detention only against the defendant because the defendant's…