From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delgado v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 2, 2010
621 F.3d 957 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 03-74442.

September 2, 2010.

Hernan Ismael Delgado, Brett Dignam, Esquire, Sylmar, CA, pro se.

Niels W. Frenzen, Esquire, University of Southern CA Law School, Los Angeles, CA, Scott L. Shuchart, Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, for Petitioner.

CAS-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Home-land Security, San Diego, CA, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Senior Litigation Counsel, Linda S. Wendtland, Esquire, Erica Miles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Prior report: 563 F.3d 863.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Delgado v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 2, 2010
621 F.3d 957 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Delgado v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:Hernan Ismael DELGADO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Citations

621 F.3d 957 (9th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Nunez v. Garland

Sanchez Nunez's argument that her DUI conviction is not a particularly serious crime rests on the panel…

Delgado v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Judge Berzon concurred in part and dissented in part in both opinions. We granted rehearing en banc, see…