From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 20, 1988
528 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

In Davis, the Second District Court of Appeal held that a negotiated plea agreement obviated the need for the court to make the written findings and reasons for imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile defendant.

Summary of this case from Sirmons v. State

Opinion

No. 86-1680.

July 20, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sarasota County, Andrew D. Owens, Jr., J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Tyrone Davis appeals his sentence for grand theft and burglary of a conveyance. We find that the trial court erred in sentencing Davis beyond the maximum authorized by statute and remand for resentencing.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Davis pled nolo contendere to grand theft and burglary of a conveyance occurring on November 12, 1985 and March 10, 1986 respectively, and was sentenced as a youthful offender to four years imprisonment to be followed by two years community control on each charge to run concurrently. Grand theft and burglary of a conveyance, as charged in the information, are both third-degree felonies punishable by a maximum five years imprisonment. When the trial judge imposed four years imprisonment followed by two years of community control concurrently on each charge, he exceeded the statutory maximum. State v. Milbry, 476 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 1985). See Committee Note to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12).

Davis argues that the trial judge erred in failing to provide written reasons for departing from the guidelines and for imposing adult sanctions pursuant to section 39.111(6)(d), Fla. Stat. (1985). Because the adjudication was entered pursuant to a plea agreement, however, we find the need for such written reasons has been obviated. See Johnson v. State, 458 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Green v. State, 460 So.2d 378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See also State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984).

We, therefore, affirm the convictions, but remand for resentencing within the statutory maximum sentences.

Remand for resentencing.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 20, 1988
528 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

In Davis, the Second District Court of Appeal held that a negotiated plea agreement obviated the need for the court to make the written findings and reasons for imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile defendant.

Summary of this case from Sirmons v. State

In Davis, we held that a juvenile's plea pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement obviates the need for a trial court to make the required written findings concerning the juvenile's suitability for adult sanctions.

Summary of this case from Croskey v. State

In Davis v. State, 528 So.2d 521 (Fla.2d DCA 1988), rev. denied, 536 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1988) the second district held that where an adjudication was entered pursuant to a plea agreement, the need for written reasons under section 39.111(7)(d) is obviated.

Summary of this case from Jones v. State
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE DAVIS, A/K/A TYRONE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 20, 1988

Citations

528 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sirmons v. State

The trial court noted that Sirmon's sentence fit within the nine- to twelve-year sentence recommended by the…

Rollins v. State

The state responds that such findings can be knowingly and intelligently waived, State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d…