From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 11, 2001
791 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

certifying same conflict

Summary of this case from Fletcher v. State

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-202

May 2, 2001. Opinion on Certification of Conflict July 11, 2001

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Hubert R. Lindsey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-5936 CFA02.

Adrian Davis, Belle Glade, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse and remand for a determination of whether it can be shown that the trial court would have imposed the same 1995 guidelines departure sentence under the 1994 guidelines. See Lemon v. State, 769 So.2d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). If such showing cannot be made, then resentencing is required under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000).

Stevenson, Gross and Taylor, JJ., Concur.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT


We grant appellee's motion for certification of conflict. In our original opinion, we reversed and remanded for a determination of whether it could be shown that the trial court would have imposed the same 1995 guidelines departure sentence under the 1994 guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000); Lemon v. State, 769 So.2d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

In Ray v. State, 772 So.2d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and Kwil v. State, 768 So.2d 502 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), the Second District found that the defendants were not adversely affected by the unconstitutional amendments to the sentencing guidelines because the records reflected that the trial courts imposed the upward departure sentences based on statutory factors that were equally valid under the 1994 and 1995 sentencing guidelines. The Second District, therefore, does not require a showing that the trial court would have imposed the departure sentence under the 1994 guidelines, but, instead, requires only a showing that the trial court could have imposed the same departure sentence. Thus, we certify conflict with both Ray and Kwil.

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 11, 2001
791 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

certifying same conflict

Summary of this case from Fletcher v. State
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 11, 2001

Citations

791 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Lemon

We note that subsequent to the opinion in Lemon, the Fourth District has certified conflict with both Ray and…

State v. Davis

PER CURIAM. We have for review the decision in Davis v. State, 791 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which…