From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 13, 1998
710 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

finding that the objection was not preserved

Summary of this case from Carratelli v. State

Opinion

No. 96-2911

Opinion filed May 13, 1998. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1998

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Martin D. Kahn, Judge. L.T. No. 95-23785.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Lara J. Edelstein (Fort Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.


Of the appellant's claims of trial error, his contention that a state peremptory challenge was improperly permitted over a Neil objection, although well taken, was not properly preserved, Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174 (Fla. 1993); Bauta v. State, 698 So.2d 860 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review granted, 705 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1998); Karp v. State, 698 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and the other two present no reversible error. Hence, the convictions for first degree murder and armed burglary with a firearm on review are affirmed.

As the state acknowledges, however, the sentences must be corrected after remand to provide that the mandatory minimum terms for the use of a firearm in the two crimes must be made concurrent rather than consecutive because they occurred during a single criminal episode. State v. Christian, 692 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1997). In addition, the separate conviction and sentence for the possession of a firearm during the course of the armed burglary are vacated on the authority of Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1991).

Affirmed as modified.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 13, 1998
710 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

finding that the objection was not preserved

Summary of this case from Carratelli v. State

In Davis, which involved trial counsel's failure to renew an objection under Joiner, the eleventh circuit characterized the failure to renew under Joiner as "unrelated to the outcome of his trial."

Summary of this case from Carratelli v. State
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HENRY DAVIS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 13, 1998

Citations

710 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Secretary for Dept. of Corrections

Essentially, he asserted that the trial court erred in overruling his attorney's Batson challenge, because…

Carratelli v. State

Carratelli relies upon Davis v. Secretary for Department of Corrections, 341 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2003).…