In Davidoff v. Davidoff, 12 Misc.3d 1162(A), 2006 WL 1479558 (Sup. Ct. May 10, 2006), the defendant "caus[ed] a depletion or deletion of information" from plaintiff's website, "thereby adversely affecting [its] effectiveness."
Summary of this case from Fischkoff v. Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.May 10, 2006.
Courts — Jurisdiction — Long-Arm Jurisdiction. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 302 (a) (Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries).
In Davidoff v. Davidoff, 12 Misc.3d 1162(A), 2006 WL 1479558 (Sup. Ct. May 10, 2006), the defendant "caus[ed] a depletion or deletion of information" from plaintiff's website, "thereby adversely affecting [its] effectiveness."
Summary of this case from Fischkoff v. Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.In Davidoff, the defendants, who resided in Florida, were alleged to have uploaded demeaning photographs and comments about the plaintiff to a website via their personal computers.
Summary of this case from Thackurdeen v. Duke Univ.In Davidoff, plaintiff's aunt and uncle, who reside in Florida, accessed plaintiff's business internet website, deleted plaintiff's files on the business website, and then placed their own picture of plaintiff on the website with the words "Pig of the Year," and "I'm going to eat everything in site" next to the that picture.
Summary of this case from Barbato v. GiacinFull title:Davidoff v. Davidoff
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date published: May 10, 2006
Longines–Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 443, 464, 261 N.Y.S.2d 8, 209 N.E.2d 68…
N.Y. Landmarks Conservancy, Inc. v. 375 Park Ave. Fee, LLC"The distinction between conversion and trespass to chattels is that where a defendant merely interfered with…