From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daron v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2011
No. CV 11-1100-JST(PLA) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2011)

Summary

discussing constitutionality of CALCRIM 372

Summary of this case from Evans v. Spearman

Opinion

No. CV 11-1100-JST(PLA)

11-19-2011

CHARLES L. DARON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D. McDONALD, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

HONORABLE JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Daron v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2011
No. CV 11-1100-JST(PLA) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2011)

discussing constitutionality of CALCRIM 372

Summary of this case from Evans v. Spearman
Case details for

Daron v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES L. DARON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D. McDONALD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2011

Citations

No. CV 11-1100-JST(PLA) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2011)

Citing Cases

Evans v. Spearman

Moreover, federal courts have rejected similar arguments, finding that CALCRIM 372 does not create…