From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 4, 1958
258 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 15718.

August 4, 1958.

Phillip Daniels, Steilacoom, Wash., for appellant.

Wm. T. Plummer, U.S. Atty., George N. Hayes, Asst. U.S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee.

Before ORR, FEE and BARNES, Circuit Judges.


On December 1, 1952, appellant plead guilty to a violation of section 65-4-1, Alaska Compiled Laws Annotated, 1949 (murder in the first degree). He was sentenced to life imprisonment.

On September 29, 1956, appellant filed a motion in the District Court, Third Division, Alaska under 28 U.S.C.A. section 2255 to set aside and vacate the judgment of conviction entered on his plea of guilty.

On November 23, 1956, the District Court denied the motion. An appeal was taken from said judgment of denial to this court.

On May 28, 1957, 9 Cir., 246 F.2d 194, this court affirmed the order of the District Court.

On July 5, 1957, appellant filed a second motion under 28 U.S.C.A. section 2255 setting up the identical grounds set forth in his first motion. This second motion was denied on July 26, 1957, by the District Court on the ground that "the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motions for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner." The instant appeal is from said second denial of relief under section 2255.

The identical relief was asked in both petitions, hence the District Court exercised a sound discretion in dismissing the second petition and its order is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Daniels v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 4, 1958
258 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1958)
Case details for

Daniels v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Phillip DANIELS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 4, 1958

Citations

258 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1958)
17 Alaska 670

Citing Cases

Way v. United States

The decisions have been uniform in holding that where the second petition alleges substantially the same…

United States v. Orlando

Section 2255 expressly relieves him of the requirement to do so. Bent v. United States, 308 F.2d 585,…