From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dancy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 16, 1973
284 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 73-235.

October 16, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court (formerly Criminal Court of Record) for Dade County, Ellen Morphonios Rowe, J.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gary M. Carman, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


Defendant-appellant was charged by information with (1) carrying a concealed firearm and (2) unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, tried non-jury, convicted on count # 1 and sentenced to two (2) years imprisonment.

The state having abandoned count # 2.

On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying defense's motion for judgment of acquittal where the evidence is legally insufficient. We cannot agree.

A defendant who moves for a directed verdict of acquittal admits all the facts in evidence adduced and every conclusion favorable to the state fairly and reasonably inferable therefrom. Lett v. State, Fla. App. 1965, 174 So.2d 568; Dixon v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 180 So.2d 681. After a thorough examination of the record, we conclude that there was substantial evidence with all reasonable inferences fairly drawn therefrom to sustain the judgment of conviction.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dancy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 16, 1973
284 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Dancy v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD DANCY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 16, 1973

Citations

284 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Leath v. State

It is axiomatic that a motion for judgment of acquittal made pursuant to RCrP 3.380 admits all facts in…

Andreasen v. State

A defendant in a criminal prosecution, moving for a directed verdict of acquittal, admits facts in evidence…