From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cyrus v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 2000
759 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2000)

Opinion

No. SC95050.

Opinion filed May 18, 2000.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions — Third District — No. 3D97-3460 (Dade County).

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Michael J. Neimand, Bureau Chief, and Christine E. Zahralban, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review Cyrus v. State, 717 So.2d 619 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), in which the Third District Court of Appeal held chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, to be constitutional. In so holding, the Cyrus court certified conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal's decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on our decision in State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999), we quash the decision below and remand for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect on December 9, 1996, the date on which Cyrus committed the underlying offense for which he was sentenced as a violent career criminal. See Thompson, 750 So.2d at 649 (remanding for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time the defendant committed her offenses).

Based on our decision in Salters v. State, No. SC95663 (Fla. May 11, 2000), we determine that Cyrus has standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, on single subject rule grounds. Further, even though Cyrus failed to raise a single subject rule challenge in the trial court, we find that such challenge may be properly addressed in this case for the first time on appeal. Cf. Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, S138, S140 n. 4 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000); Nelson v. State, 748 So.2d 237, 241-42 (Fla. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S.Ct. 950 (2000); State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1, 3-4 (Fla. 1993).

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

WELLS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Cyrus v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 2000
759 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2000)
Case details for

Cyrus v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL CYRUS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 18, 2000

Citations

759 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2000)