From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 16, 1997
696 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-01349

Opinion filed July 16, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Bob Anderson Mitcham, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Raymundo Cruz challenges the judgment and sentence imposed upon him by the trial court for his conviction of trafficking in cannabis. We affirm the judgment and sentence except for the imposition of the public defender lien. The record shows that the trial court did not advise Cruz of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). Faircloth v. State, 686 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

We remand this case with instructions that Cruz be given thirty days to file a written objection to the amount of the lien. If he files an objection, the trial court must strike the lien and it may impose a new lien provided that Cruz is afforded the required notice and hearing. Halyard v. State, 667 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 16, 1997
696 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Cruz v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAYMUNDO CRUZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 16, 1997

Citations

696 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Ely v. State

Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1). See Washington v. State, 685 So.2d 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Cruz v. State, 696…