From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cridland v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 17, 1992
605 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-3454.

September 17, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County; P. Kevin Davey, Judge.

Appellant pro se.

Judy A. Bone, Asst. General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant, an inmate in the state correctional system, seeks review of a final order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. In that petition, appellant alleged that he had been improperly denied an appropriate amount of incentive gain time for the month of June 1989. Pursuant to an order to show cause issued by the trial court, appellee, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, filed a response to the petition. However, no evidentiary hearing was held. Instead, the trial court concluded from the petition and response thereto that appellant was not entitled to the relief requested.

In our opinion, the petition and response thereto do not conclusively establish that appellant is not entitled to the relief requested in the petition. Accordingly, we are constrained to reverse the order of the trial court denying the petition for a writ of mandamus; and to remand with directions that the trial court hold an evidentiary hearing regarding the allegations of appellant's petition.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

MINER, J., dissents without written opinion.


Summaries of

Cridland v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 17, 1992
605 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Cridland v. Singletary

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE B. CRIDLAND, APPELLANT, v. HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., SECRETARY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 17, 1992

Citations

605 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Singletary

Accordingly, we conclude that the petition and DOC's response do not conclusively establish that appellant is…

Dixon v. Vaughn

Because we are unable to determine from the petition and the state's response to the order to show cause that…