From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crespo v. Florida Ent. Direct SPT

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 12, 1996
674 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-428.

April 17, 1996. Rehearing Denied June 12, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Arthur L. Rothenberg, Judge.

Al Crespo, in proper person.

Holland Knight and Robert Rivas, Palm Beach for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Chief Judge Schwartz did not participate in oral argument.


Al Crespo appeals a summary final judgment. We affirm.

Crespo sued the Florida Entertainment Direct Support Organization, Inc., and past and present members of its board of directors alleging violations of the Sunshine laws. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and Crespo has appealed.

The individual defendants are Bob Allen, Seth Gordon, Peggi McKinley, Chris Qualmann, Frank Loconto, Randall W. Lord, Mona Rowand-May, Norm Rice, Eugene Rodriguez, Ray Rodriguez, and Jo Susan Simms.

As a preliminary matter, Crespo argues that summary judgment was premature, because certain interrogatories and requests for admission had been objected to by defendants. We disagree with Crespo on this point.

Defendants had responded to all discovery which was conceivably material to the Sunshine law issues in this case. The objected-to items were reviewed in detail by defendants at the summary judgment hearing, and were clearly immaterial. When afforded an opportunity to explain the materiality of the objected-to items, plaintiff declined to argue the point.

A trial court has the discretion to deny a continuance of a summary judgment hearing where the outstanding discovery items are immaterial to the dispositive issues in the case. See Amjad Munim M.D., P.A., v. Azar, 648 So.2d 145, 151 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Colby v. Ellis, 562 So.2d 356, 357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Turning to the merits, we conclude that the summary judgment is correct. See Tolar v. School Board of Liberty County, 398 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1981); Bassett v. Braddock, 262 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1972); Monroe County v. Pigeon Key Historical Park Inc., 647 So.2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Crespo v. Florida Ent. Direct SPT

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 12, 1996
674 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Crespo v. Florida Ent. Direct SPT

Case Details

Full title:AL CRESPO, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA ENTERTAINMENT DIRECT SUPPORT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 12, 1996

Citations

674 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Vancelette v. Boulan S. Beach Condo. Ass'n, Inc.

Ms. Vancelette has not advanced any reason why she could not have completed the discovery before the summary…

Trust Real Estate Ventures, LLC v. Desnick

Thus, appellants have failed to demonstrate that the denial of the continuance was "arbitrary, fanciful, or…