From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Creative Trading Company v. Larkin-Pluznick-Larkin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 8, 1990
75 N.Y.2d 830 (N.Y. 1990)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1990

Decided February 8, 1990

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Shirley Fingerhood, J.

Robert G. Sugarman, Lawrence E. Elder and Cheryl L. Davis for appellants.

Whitney North Seymour, Jr., and Craig A. Landy for respondents.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Lloyd Constantine, Alan Pfeffer and Susan Beth Farmer of counsel), amicus curiae. Sheldon I. London for National Association of Exposition Managers, amicus curiae.


Order reversed, with costs, defendants' motion to dismiss the third and fourth causes of action of the repleaded complaint granted, and the certified question answered in the negative for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division ( 148 A.D.2d 352, 354-357).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Creative Trading Company v. Larkin-Pluznick-Larkin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 8, 1990
75 N.Y.2d 830 (N.Y. 1990)
Case details for

Creative Trading Company v. Larkin-Pluznick-Larkin

Case Details

Full title:CREATIVE TRADING COMPANY, INC., et al., Respondents, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 8, 1990

Citations

75 N.Y.2d 830 (N.Y. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 558
551 N.E.2d 1236

Citing Cases

Isaac v. Med. Liab. Mut. Ins. Co.

Moreover, a complaint that describes only unilateral conduct may not infer a conspiracy based upon that…

Cnty. Waste & Recycling Serv. v. Twin Bridges Waste & Recycling, LLC

However, this bilateralness is not of itself the type of 'arrangement' that gives rise to a cause of action…