From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 14, 2002
823 So. 2d 832 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-1425

Opinion filed August 14, 2002.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2)(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; R. Wallace Pack, Judge.


Lionel R. Crawford appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Crawford alleged that he was entitled to be resentenced pursuant to Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla. 1989). The trial court's order is not responsive to Crawford's motion and has no attachments.

We accordingly reverse and remand for reconsideration of Crawford's motion. See Terry v. State, 787 So.2d 33 (Fla.2d DCA 2001) (reversing summary denial of rule 3.800(a) motion because trial court's order was not responsive to motion and had no attachments). If the trial court again determines that summary denial is proper, it must set forth its rationale and attach any relevant portions of the record that conclusively show relief is not required.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Crawford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 14, 2002
823 So. 2d 832 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Crawford v. State

Case Details

Full title:LIONEL R. CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 14, 2002

Citations

823 So. 2d 832 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Washington v. State

The State concedes error on this point. See Crawford v. State, 823 So.2d 832 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The order of…

Suleiman v. State

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration of Suleiman's motion. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(d);…