From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 20, 1987
507 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-1873.

May 20, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Jesse C. Barber, Acting J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant David Cox appeals his judgment and sentence for resisting a law enforcement officer with force. Appellant raises several issues in this appeal, but we find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines when imposing sentence upon him.

The trial court wrote as its sole reason for departure that appellant had been classified as a habitual offender. Habitual offender status is an invalid reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986).

Accordingly, this case is remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Cox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 20, 1987
507 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Cox v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID COX, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 20, 1987

Citations

507 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Silvestrini v. State

On the bottom of the new scoresheet, "habitual felony offender" was listed as the only reason for departure.…