From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 18, 2018
Civ. No. 16-5434 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2018)

Summary

holding the claimant waived his Appointments Clause claim because it was not raised during administrative proceedings

Summary of this case from Hayes v. Saul

Opinion

Civ. No. 16-5434

12-18-2018

DONNA M. COX, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2018, after careful and independent review of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 3), Defendant's Answer (Doc. No. 8), the administrative record (Doc. No. 9), Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Judicial Review (Doc. No. 12), Defendant's Response (Doc. No. 15), Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. Nos. 16, 17), Magistrate Judge Perkin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20), Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 21), and Defendant's Response (Doc. No. 25), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 21) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. Plaintiff's Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED; and

4. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this case.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Paul S . Diamond

Paul S. Diamond, J.


Summaries of

Cox v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 18, 2018
Civ. No. 16-5434 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2018)

holding the claimant waived his Appointments Clause claim because it was not raised during administrative proceedings

Summary of this case from Hayes v. Saul

holding the claimant waived his Appointments Clause claim because it was not raised during administrative proceedings

Summary of this case from Diaz v. Saul

finding Appointments Clause challenge waived

Summary of this case from Sanchez v. Kltakazi

finding Appointments Clause challenge waived

Summary of this case from Flynn v. Saul

finding Appointments Clause challenge waived

Summary of this case from Brink v. Saul

finding Appointments Clause challenge waived

Summary of this case from Powell v. Saul

finding Appointments Clause challenge waived

Summary of this case from Wojciechowski v. Saul

finding Appointments Clause challenge waived

Summary of this case from Hill v. Saul

concluding claimant waived Appointments Clause objection by failing to raise issue at the administrative level

Summary of this case from Rich v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

concluding claimant waived Appointments Clause objection by failing to raise issue at the administrative level

Summary of this case from Cortese v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

concluding claimant waived Appointments Clause objection by failing to raise issue at the administrative level

Summary of this case from Culclasure v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

concluding claimant waived Appointments Clause objection by failing to raise issue at the administrative level

Summary of this case from Cortese v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Cox v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:DONNA M. COX, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 18, 2018

Citations

Civ. No. 16-5434 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2018)

Citing Cases

Peterman v. Berryhill

The vast majority of courts that have recently considered the issue have ruled that a social security…

Wojciechowski v. Saul

During this same time, many cases were dismissed on finding there was an exhaustion requirement at the…