From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 31, 1995
652 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

holding that the trial court correctly ignored an unsworn memorandum but erred in disregarding sworn allegations in an affidavit attached to the memorandum

Summary of this case from Wood v. State

Opinion

No. 95-387.

March 31, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Richard F. Conrad, J.

Daniel C. Courson, Lake City, pro se.

No Appearance for appellee.


Courson appeals the summary denial of his motion filed in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 for post-conviction relief. He seeks belated appeals for sentences imposed in two criminal cases. He entered guilty pleas in both cases, was adjudicated an habitual offender, and was sentenced to ten years and twenty-five years, respectively. In his motion, Courson concludes he is entitled to belated direct appeals. We reverse.

The trial court denied the 3.850 motion because Courson failed to alleged in his sworn pleading that he instructed his attorney to file the appeals within the time permitted under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(g). In Courson's supplemental memorandum, which was filed with his motion, these missing allegations are sufficiently made, but the memorandum does not contain a proper oath that the alleged facts are true and correct. The trial court therefore disregarded the memorandum, and did not hold a hearing to determine the veracity of the facts asserted.

However, the appendix to the memorandum does contain a sworn affidavit prepared by Courson in which he alleges that on the sentencing date in each case, he requested defense counsel to appeal the sentence imposed. These sworn allegations should have been included in the 3.850 motion, and the trial court cannot be faulted for overlooking the affidavit. Nevertheless, we conclude that the sworn allegations attached to the memorandum are sufficient to require further proceedings. We therefore reverse the order denying relief and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Courson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 31, 1995
652 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

holding that the trial court correctly ignored an unsworn memorandum but erred in disregarding sworn allegations in an affidavit attached to the memorandum

Summary of this case from Wood v. State

holding that the trial court correctly ignored an unsworn memorandum but erred in disregarding sworn allegations in an affidavit attached to the memorandum

Summary of this case from Gamble v. State

remanding for evidentiary hearing on ineffective assistance of counsel claim where defendant who pleaded guilty alleged that counsel failed to file notice of appeal as requested

Summary of this case from State v. Trowell
Case details for

Courson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL COURSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 31, 1995

Citations

652 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Wood v. State

Because the memorandum is properly sworn, the trial court should have considered it in evaluating the…

Trowell v. State

We cannot agree. The court's decision in Thomas is inconsistent with a substantial body of case law from this…