From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copley v. Voorhies

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 27, 2007
CASE NO. 2:06-cv-847 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-847.

August 27, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER


On July 27, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's conclusions and recommendations. Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments that previously were presented. This Court has carefully considered the entire record in this case.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to by petitioner. For the reasons that follow, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and A FFIRMED. This action hereby is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Copley v. Voorhies

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 27, 2007
CASE NO. 2:06-cv-847 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Copley v. Voorhies

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT A. COPLEY, Petitioner, v. EDWIN VOORHIES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 27, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-847 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

State v. Green

Higgins v. Penobscot Co. Sheriff's Dept. (D.Me. June 2, 2005), Case No. 04-157-B-W. See, also, Copley v.…

State v. Dennis

Higgins v. Penobscot Cty. Sheriff's Dept. (June 2, 2005), D.Maine No. 04-157-B-W, 2005 WL 1331200, 2005 WL…