From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Feb 24, 2009
CV 307-072 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2009)

Summary

rejecting ALJ's decision for his failure to analyze, evaluate or give weight to treating physician's opinion

Summary of this case from Morrison v. Astrue

Opinion

CV 307-072.

February 24, 2009


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accordance with the Court's opinion.

SO ORDERED, at Augusta, Georgia.


Summaries of

Cook v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Feb 24, 2009
CV 307-072 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2009)

rejecting ALJ's decision for his failure to analyze, evaluate or give weight to treating physician's opinion

Summary of this case from Morrison v. Astrue
Case details for

Cook v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA ANN COOK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Citations

CV 307-072 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2009)

Citing Cases

Morrison v. Astrue

An ALJ, however, must state the weight accorded to a treating source's opinion and must explain the…

Gaskin v. Astrue

This Court, however, cannot engage in a post-hoc analysis creating reasons out of whole cloth to support an…