Opinion
Argued November 14, 1882
Decided November 21, 1882
E.F. Bullard for appellant.
Nathaniel C. Moak for respondent.
Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Consalus v. Brotherson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1882
90 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1882)
Summaries of
Consalus v. Brotherson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1882
90 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1882)
Case details for
Consalus v. Brotherson
Case Details
Full title:EMANUEL CONSALUS, Appellant, v . JOHN BROTHERSON, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 21, 1882
Citations
90 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1882)
Citing Cases
WATERTOWN BUSINESS MEN'S ASSOCIATION v. GREEN
This provision has repeatedly been given a restricted rather than a contrary construction. Moses v. McDivitt,…
Tilden v. AitkinThe proceeding which plaintiff proposed to take in the Surrogate's Court to collect a claim which he thought…