From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connell v. Riggins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 16, 2002
820 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 1D01-3844.

July 16, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Honorable Jean M. Johnson.

Stephen E. Day, and Rhonda B. Boggess, of Taylor, Day Currie, Jacksonville, for Appellants.

Fletcher Farrington, Savannah, Georgia; Robert F. Spohrer and Steven R. Browning, of Spohrer, Wilner, Maxwell Matthews, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.


Appellants Robert Carter Connell and Connell Son, Inc. argue that the trial court erred by (i) granting the appellees' motion for new trial, and (ii) admitting a driver's manual as evidence of the standard of care required when approaching a yellow flashing traffic light. We affirm the trial court's granting of appellee's motion for new trial because there was no abuse of discretion. However, we agree with appellants that the driver's manual should not have been admitted into evidence. See Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co, 429 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (ruling that driver's handbook should not have been admitted into evidence).

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Connell v. Riggins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 16, 2002
820 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Connell v. Riggins

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CARTER CONNELL, AND CONNELL SON, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 16, 2002

Citations

820 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Connell v. Riggins

Mr. Connell notes that in our opinion issued in the appeal after the first trial, we expressly agreed with…