From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Raban

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 4, 2012
52 A.3d 222 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-4

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Simon RABAN, Petitioner.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Superior Court, No. 28 MAL 2012.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 31 A.3d 699.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court correctly held that Section 305(a)(1) of the Dog Law, 3 P.S. § 459–305(a)(1), is a strict liability offense. In briefing this issue, the parties are directed to include a discussion within the framework of the Statutory Construction Act, 1 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 1501 et seq. , as to whether the General Assembly intended Section 305(a)(1) to be a strict liability offense.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Raban

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 4, 2012
52 A.3d 222 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Raban

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Simon RABAN, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 4, 2012

Citations

52 A.3d 222 (Pa. 2012)

Citing Cases

In re C.S.

Commonwealth v. Graham, 607 Pa. 580, 9 A.3d 196, 202 n. 13 (2010).” Commonwealth v. Greene, 25 A.3d 359, 361…

Commonwealth v. Rushing

Commonwealth v. Graham, 607 Pa. 580, 9 A.3d 196, 202 n. 13 (2010).” Commonwealth v. Greene, 25 A.3d 359, 361…