From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Ball

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 24, 2015
111 A.3d 745 (Pa. 2015)

Opinion

No. 719 MAL 2014

2015-03-24

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. James Arthur BALL, III, Respondent.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Given the extensive impact the Superior Court's published opinion could have on the lower courts and prosecution offices in situations where a defendant initiates a statutory summary appeal from a Magisterial District Judge's sua sponte finding of guilt on an uncharged, lesser-included offense, should this Honorable Court grant review because the purpose for double jeopardy protections are not implicated, or implicated minimally, when the defendant appeals his conviction for a trial de novo?

(2) Should this Honorable Court exercise its supervisory authority over the Superior Court's erroneous discharge of defendant and remand his case for sentencing on the lesser-included offense he appeals and necessarily was found guilty of committing?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Ball

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 24, 2015
111 A.3d 745 (Pa. 2015)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Ball

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. JAMES ARTHUR BALL, III.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 24, 2015

Citations

111 A.3d 745 (Pa. 2015)