From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commodity Exch. v. Commodity Futures Trading

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 4, 1983
703 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1983)

Opinion

Nos. 844, 1096, Dockets 82-6250, 82-6264.

Argued February 23, 1983.

Decided April 4, 1983.

Kenneth M. Raisler, Deputy General Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Com'n, Washington, D.C. (Dennis A. Dutterer, General Counsel, Pat G. Nicolette, Deputy General Counsel, Gregory C. Glynn, Associate General Counsel, Elizabeth Knoblock, Attorney, Commodity Futures Trading Com'n, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Commodity Futures Trading Com'n.

Barry J. Mandel, New York City (Mark A. Buckstein, Allan Dinkoff, Baer, Marks Upham, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant Commodity Exchange, Inc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before PIERCE, WINTER and PRATT, Circuit Judges.


The judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed, 543 F.Supp. 1340, substantially for the reasons given by Judge Weinfeld in his opinion dated July 29, 1982.


Summaries of

Commodity Exch. v. Commodity Futures Trading

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 4, 1983
703 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1983)
Case details for

Commodity Exch. v. Commodity Futures Trading

Case Details

Full title:COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT, v. COMMODITY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 1983

Citations

703 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Atkins

Miller v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 827, 828-29 (1985). See generally Lasker v. Bear, Stearns Co., 757 F.2d 15,…

Merrill Lynch v. Bobker

tory of Rule 10b-4 makes clear that if Merrill Lynch had not cancelled Bobker's short sale and Bobker had…