From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Powers (In re Powers)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2013
109 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-08-22

In the Matter of Michael J. POWERS, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Michael J. Powers, Respondent.

Michael G. Gaynor, Acting Chief Attorney, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Elizabeth M. Devane of counsel), for petitioner. Michael J. Powers, Norwood, Massachusetts, respondent pro se.


Michael G. Gaynor, Acting Chief Attorney, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Elizabeth M. Devane of counsel), for petitioner. Michael J. Powers, Norwood, Massachusetts, respondent pro se.
Before: PETERS, P.J., ROSE, SPAIN and GARRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Massachusetts.

By order dated February 21, 2013, the Board of Bar Overseers of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court publicly reprimanded respondent for improperly managing his attorney trust account.

As a result of the discipline imposed in Massachusetts, petitioner moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court's rules ( see22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has filed a reply affidavit that we conclude does not establish any of the available defenses to the imposition of discipline ( see22 NYCRR 806.19[d] ), and we therefore grant petitioner's motion.

Having considered all of the circumstances presented, including due consideration of respondent's misconduct and the discipline imposed in Massachusetts, we conclude that respondent should be censured in this state ( see e.g. Matter of Weissman, 32 A.D.3d 1150, 821 N.Y.S.2d 480 [2006] ).

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is hereby censured.

PETERS, P.J., ROSE, SPAIN and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Powers (In re Powers)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2013
109 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Powers (In re Powers)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael J. POWERS, an Attorney. Committee on Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 22, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5716
970 N.Y.S.2d 712

Citing Cases

Parker v. the State

That being without such limitations or exceptions the Act of 1902 is unconstitutional is clearly shown by the…