From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 5, 1990
554 So. 2d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-02687.

January 5, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Susan C. Bucklew, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Donna A. Provonsha, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We reverse the sentence imposed upon defendant upon the revocation of his probation and remand for conformity of the sentence to the trial court's oral pronouncement. The oral pronouncement imposed 120 days in the county jail, to be suspended when defendant brought current the amounts he owed for restitution and apparently costs of probation supervision. The written order and judgment of guilt indicated, however, that defendant was to be additionally placed on two years probation.

There is no merit in defendant's additional contention.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cobb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 5, 1990
554 So. 2d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Cobb v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES COBB, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 5, 1990

Citations

554 So. 2d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Singleton v. State

On remand, the trial court should correct the written sentence as to credit for time served. See Cobb v.…

McDonald v. State

Normally, the oral pronouncement would prevail and this court would remand to conform the written sentence to…