rejecting treating physician's opinion in part because the opinion was "speculative and inconsistent with [the claimant's] activities of daily living during the relevant period"
Summary of this case from Karasik-Tosk v. BerryhillNo. 16–1345.
06-26-2017
Emily COATY, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
rejecting treating physician's opinion in part because the opinion was "speculative and inconsistent with [the claimant's] activities of daily living during the relevant period"
Summary of this case from Karasik-Tosk v. BerryhillFull title:Emily COATY, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Jun 26, 2017
Thus, substantial evidence supports the ALJ's use of Plaintiff's activities of daily living to discount Dr.…
McGrath v. Berryhilldenied sub nom. Coaty v. Berryhill, 137 S. Ct. 2309 (2017); Lunn v. Astrue, 300 F. App'x 524, 525 (9th Cir.…