From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clinton v. Los Angeles County

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 27, 1970
434 F.2d 1038 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 24671.

November 27, 1970.

Richard H. Clinton, in pro. per.

Evelle J. Younger, Dist. Atty., John Tucker, of Rathbone, King Seeley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.


Richard H. Clinton appeals from a dismissal by the district court, on its own motion and without notice and hearing, of his complaint for damages under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

It is now well established that the district court did not follow the proper procedure in dismissing the complaint. Potter v. McCall, (9th Cir. November 4, 1970), 433 F.2d 1087; Dodd v. Spokane County, 393 F.2d 330 (9th Cir. 1969); Armstrong v. Rushing, 352 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1965); Harmon v. Superior Court, 307 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1962).

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court in order that it may follow the procedure outlined in the above-cited cases.


Summaries of

Clinton v. Los Angeles County

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 27, 1970
434 F.2d 1038 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Clinton v. Los Angeles County

Case Details

Full title:Richard H. CLINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY, State of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 27, 1970

Citations

434 F.2d 1038 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

California Diversified Promotions v. Musick

The right to a hearing on the merits of a claim over which the court has jurisdiction is of the essence of…

BOAG v. BOIES

Thus, if the court's action constituted dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim…