From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clemons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 14, 2001
777 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

remanding where there were no record attachments to refute appellant's claim that he was not afforded the opportunity to explain his post furlough arrest

Summary of this case from Aguirre v. State

Opinion

Case No. 4D00-2764

Opinion filed February 14, 2001

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-8674CFA02.

Terrance C. Clemons, Arcadia, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Terrace C. Clemons appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He contends that he is entitled to have his sentence of five years imprisonment set aside and a five month jail sentence imposed in lieu thereof, pursuant to the terms of his original plea agreement.

In his 3.850 motion, appellant alleged that he entered a guilty plea to possession of cocaine upon a plea agreement that he would receive five months in the Palm Beach county jail. He requested a furlough pending sentencing and the trial court granted it upon the condition that appellant appear as scheduled for sentencing and not get arrested for any new charges. While on furlough, appellant was arrested for possession of marijuana. He appeared for sentencing as scheduled but was sentenced to five years in prison because of the new charge. Appellant complains that he was not afforded an opportunity to explain the circumstances surrounding the later arrest and that the trial court made no findings as to why he should not be sentenced according to the terms of his plea agreement.

Because we have no record attachments concerning the circumstances of appellant's new arrest or the trial court's findings regarding his loss of entitlement to the bargained-for sentence, we remand for attachments of portions of the record or an evidentiary hearing on these issues. See Buell v. State, 704 So.2d 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Green v. State, 680 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Lee v. State, 471 So.2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

FARMER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clemons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 14, 2001
777 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

remanding where there were no record attachments to refute appellant's claim that he was not afforded the opportunity to explain his post furlough arrest

Summary of this case from Aguirre v. State

In Clemons v. State, 777 So.2d 1169, 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this Court reversed the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion where the defendant contended that he was entitled to the terms of his original plea agreement. During a furlough, he was arrested on a new charge, which violated the terms of his plea.

Summary of this case from Garcia v. State
Case details for

Clemons v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE C. CLEMONS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 14, 2001

Citations

777 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. State

Underscoring this point is that on direct appeal of his judgment and sentence, the Public Defender's Office…

Ali v. State

Additionally, despite the State's argument to the contrary, the relief which Defendant requests is cognizable…