From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clement v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 5, 1985
468 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-1573.

May 8, 1985. Mandate Stayed and Rehearing Denied June 5, 1985.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Mark Speiser, Judge.

Howard L. Finkelstein of Finkelstein and Dallas, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Teitler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


While we affirm all of the judgment and convictions, we must remand for resentencing. The trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA March 27, 1985).

Upon resentencing, there can be no retention of jurisdiction, and any departure from the guidelines must be based upon clear and convincing reasons, expressed in writing.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clement v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 5, 1985
468 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Clement v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PATRICK CLEMENT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 5, 1985

Citations

468 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Dawson v. State

Retention of jurisdiction over any portion of a sentence imposed under the guidelines — as this sentence…

Clement v. State

PER CURIAM. Upon remand for resentencing after this court reversed appellant's initial sentence for failure…