From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayworth v. Luzerne Cnty.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
May 15, 2013
No. 11-4593 (3d Cir. May. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-4593

05-15-2013

FRED CLAYWORTH, individually and as parent and natural guardian of G.H., Appellant v. LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA; LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES; FRANK CASTANO; JOSEPH KLOSS; JOHN KOSLOSKI; TARA MCCUTCHEON; WILMA SNOPEK; JOANNE VAN SAUN


Before: FUENTES, HARDIMAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges


ORDER

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed February 5, 2013 is hereby VACATED, and a new opinion and judgment will issue forthwith.

By the Court,

JANE R. ROTH

Circuit Judge
Tnh/cc: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Clayworth v. Luzerne Cnty.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
May 15, 2013
No. 11-4593 (3d Cir. May. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Clayworth v. Luzerne Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:FRED CLAYWORTH, individually and as parent and natural guardian of G.H.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: May 15, 2013

Citations

No. 11-4593 (3d Cir. May. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Taylor

See, e.g., ECF No. 215 at 2 (“The governments] proposed conditions of release are excessive and violate the…

Townsend v. Cnty. of Mercer

2. Ninth Amendment Claim The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “The enumeration in…