From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark-Cowlitz Jt. Operating Agcy. v. F.E.R.C

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 16, 1986
787 F.2d 674 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 83-2231.

January 16, 1986.

Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA, STARR, SILBERMAN and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


The suggestions for rehearing en banc have been circulated to the full Court. A vote was requested and a majority of the judges in regular active service have voted in favor of the suggestions. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestions for rehearing en banc are granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the opinion and judgment of October 22, 1985, 775 F.2d 366, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order of the Court will govern further proceedings in this case.

MIKVA Circuit Judge, would deny the suggestions.

WALD and SILBERMAN Circuit Judges, did not participate in this order.


Summaries of

Clark-Cowlitz Jt. Operating Agcy. v. F.E.R.C

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 16, 1986
787 F.2d 674 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
Case details for

Clark-Cowlitz Jt. Operating Agcy. v. F.E.R.C

Case Details

Full title:CLARK-COWLITZ JOINT OPERATING AGENCY v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jan 16, 1986

Citations

787 F.2d 674 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

W. Minn. Mun. Power Agency v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n

There is nothing patently unreasonable in favoring any and all municipalities over private applicants when “…

W. Minn. Mun. Power Agency v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n

There is nothing patently unreasonable in favoring any and all municipalities over private applicants when “…