From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Pompano Beach v. Oltman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 8, 1969
228 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 69-127.

December 8, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Stephen R. Booher, J.

Thomas P. Quinn and David T. Price, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Roger H. Harper, Boca Raton, for appellees.


A judgment for the defendant on a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 1.140(c), RCP, 30 F.S.A., may not be granted on the basis of allegations in the defendant's answer where no reply is required because such allegations are deemed denied, Miller v. Eatmon, Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 523. For this reason, we affirm the order of the trial court denying defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Affirmed.

McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

CROSS, C.J., concurs in conclusion.


Summaries of

City of Pompano Beach v. Oltman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 8, 1969
228 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

City of Pompano Beach v. Oltman

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, APPELLANT, v. L.M. OLTMAN, GERALD F. GLASS AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 8, 1969

Citations

228 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

Appel v. Scott

A defendant may not obtain a judgment on the pleadings on the basis of allegations in his answer where a…