From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Marietta v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 8, 2000
225 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2000)

Opinion

No. 98-8436

September 8, 2000.

Sandra Gray, Casey, Gilson Williams, P.C., George Sering Zier, Dept. of Law/State of GA, Matthew D. Williams, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Ray O. Lerer, Atlanta, GA, for Amicus Curiae, GA Municipal Ass'n and State of Georgia.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 96-03509-1-CV-MHS); Marvin H. Shoob, Judge.

Before EDMONDSON, COX and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.


This is our second opinion in this appeal in which the City of Marietta seeks to reverse summary judgment in favor of CSX Transportation on the City's claims arising from CSX's closure of two pedestrian railroad crossings. See City of Marietta v. CSX Transp., 196 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 1999). In the first opinion, we asked the Georgia Supreme Court whether "the public [can] acquire a right against the State of Georgia, and hence against its lessee CSX, to use the crossings at Depot and Dobbs Streets, such that the streets may not be closed without Marietta's consent?" Id. at 1309.

The Georgia Supreme Court has now answered the question "in the negative." City of Marietta v. CSX Transp., 272 Ga. 612, 615, 533 S.E.2d 372 (2000). As we observed in certifying the question, a "no" would be dispositive of all of the City of Marietta's Georgia-law claims. See City of Marietta, 196 F.3d at 1307-08. The Georgia Supreme Court has not corrected our reading of Georgia law on that point, and we therefore conclude that the district court's summary judgment in CSX's favor must be

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

City of Marietta v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 8, 2000
225 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2000)
Case details for

City of Marietta v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF MARIETTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Sep 8, 2000

Citations

225 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rigel Ships Agencies, Inc.

This opinion was later amended to conform to an answer to a question — unrelated to the point of law at issue…