From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Chicago v. Myers

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Oct 1, 1968
100 Ill. App. 2d 87 (Ill. App. Ct. 1968)

Summary

In Myers, there was uncontradicted testimony as to the size, color and placement of "No Left Turn" traffic signs and testimony that they did not meet the standard or special alternative specifications required by the manual.

Summary of this case from Young v. Gateway Transportation Co.

Opinion

Gen. No. 52,629. (Abstract of Decision.)

October 1, 1968.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, Municipal Department, First District; the Hon. JOHN A. OUSKA, Judge, presiding.

Judgment reversed.

Lowell J. Myers, pro se, of Chicago, appellant;

Raymond F. Simon, Corporation Counsel, of Chicago (Marvin E. Aspen and Howard C. Goldman, Assistant Corporation Counsel), of counsel, for appellee.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

City of Chicago v. Myers

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Oct 1, 1968
100 Ill. App. 2d 87 (Ill. App. Ct. 1968)

In Myers, there was uncontradicted testimony as to the size, color and placement of "No Left Turn" traffic signs and testimony that they did not meet the standard or special alternative specifications required by the manual.

Summary of this case from Young v. Gateway Transportation Co.
Case details for

City of Chicago v. Myers

Case Details

Full title:City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, Appellee, v. Lowell J. Myers…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division

Date published: Oct 1, 1968

Citations

100 Ill. App. 2d 87 (Ill. App. Ct. 1968)
242 N.E.2d 14

Citing Cases

Young v. Gateway Transportation Co.

Specifically, defendants contend that while testimony was introduced establishing the existence of a "No…