From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Buffalo v. the Frontier Telephone Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1911
96 N.E. 1112 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued October 24, 1911

Decided November 21, 1911

Daniel J. Kenefick and Guy Wellman for appellants.

Clark H. Hammond, Corporation Counsel ( George E. Pierce of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The defendant having applied for and voluntarily entered into the agreement with the city, it is not in a position to challenge its validity; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

City of Buffalo v. the Frontier Telephone Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1911
96 N.E. 1112 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

City of Buffalo v. the Frontier Telephone Company

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BUFFALO, Respondent, v . THE FRONTIER TELEPHONE COMPANY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 21, 1911

Citations

96 N.E. 1112 (N.Y. 1911)
203 N.Y. 589

Citing Cases

Murray v. New York Telephone Co.

Henceforth the company is estopped from insisting upon want of authority to impose the condition. Rochester…

Gilchrist v. Interborough Co.

Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Larabee Mills, 211 U.S. 612; Manitowoc v. Manitowoc Northern Traction Co., 145…