From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

U.S.
Jun 29, 2009
129 S. Ct. 2893 (2009)

Opinion

No. 08-205

June 29, 2009.


This case is restored to the calendar for reargument. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: For the proper disposition of this case, should the Court overrule either or both Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), and the part of McConnell v. Federal Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), which addresses the facial validity of Section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, 2 U.S.C. § 441b? The briefs, not to exceed 6,000 words, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Friday, July 24, 2009. Amicus briefs, not to exceed 4,500 words, may be filed with the Clerk and served upon counsel to the parties by 2 p.m., Friday, July 31, 2009. Reply briefs, not to exceed 3,000 words, may be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Wednesday, August 19, 2009. The case is set for oral argument at 10 a.m., Wednesday, September 9, 2009.


Summaries of

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

U.S.
Jun 29, 2009
129 S. Ct. 2893 (2009)
Case details for

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Case Details

Full title:CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 29, 2009

Citations

129 S. Ct. 2893 (2009)
174 L. Ed. 2d 599