From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cicero v. Paradis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 5, 1964
167 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 4921.

August 5, 1964.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, James S. Moody, J.

Alan R. Schwartz, of Nichols, Gaither, Beckham, Colson Spence, Miami, for appellants.

H.J. Ulrich, of Ulrich, Rubin Berman, Miami Beach, for appellees.


Plaintiffs have appealed an order dismissing their complaint and cause in a negligence action. Appellees urge on their motion to dismiss the appeal that the order is non-appealable under Shotkin v. Deehl, Fla.App. 1963, 148 So.2d 538; Baker v. Colley, Fla.App. 1958, 104 So.2d 473; Rule 3.2 (b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. This contention is without merit. The trial court not only dismissed the complaint but also dismissed the cause, and therefore the order is final and appealable. See Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc., Fla.App. 1963, 155 So.2d 420 and cases therein cited. Appellees' motions to dismiss and quash the appeal are denied.

SMITH, C.J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cicero v. Paradis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 5, 1964
167 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Cicero v. Paradis

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH JOHN CICERO, JR., A MINOR BY HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND JOSEPH JOHN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 5, 1964

Citations

167 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Raphael v. Carner

It thus appears that the order appealed is interlocutory because it merely grants with prejudice a motion to…