From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chertoff v. Chertoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 30, 1989
553 So. 2d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

Nos. 88-2497, 88-1198.

August 1, 1989. On Motion for Rehearing November 28, 1989. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1989.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Jack M. Turner, Judge.

Sidney L. Syna, Miami, for appellant.

L.P. Evans, Jr., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and COPE, JJ.


Affirmed. Bennett v. Bennett, 73 So.2d 274 (Fla. 1954); Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So.2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Adams v. Adams, 385 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF ATTORNEY'S FEE AWARD


The husband has moved for rehearing of the court's award of attorney's fees to the wife. We grant rehearing.

An award of attorney's fees in a matrimonial action is not governed by a "prevailing party" standard but instead is predicated on the need of one spouse for the attorney's fee award and the ability of the other spouse to pay the award. Thornton v. Thornton, 433 So.2d 682, 683-84 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); see Sierra v. Sierra, 505 So.2d 432, 433 (Fla. 1987); Ludemann v. Ludemann, 317 So.2d 860, 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (1987); P. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16.5, at 269 (1988). The husband correctly points out that the present record does not contain sufficient information to establish the need of the wife, nor the ability to pay of the husband. Pursuant to Rule 9.400(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we provisionally award appellate attorney's fees to the wife, and remand for the trial court to determine need and ability to pay. See Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So.2d 1152, 1154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). If need and ability to pay are found to exist, then the trial court is authorized to set the amount of the appellate attorney's fees.

The husband's motion for attorney's fees, predicated solely on section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987), was previously denied.

Appellate attorney's fees provisionally granted; remanded for hearing.


Summaries of

Chertoff v. Chertoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 30, 1989
553 So. 2d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Chertoff v. Chertoff

Case Details

Full title:BRAD CHERTOFF, APPELLANT, v. POPPY CHERTOFF, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 30, 1989

Citations

553 So. 2d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Rosen v. Rosen

A review of district court opinions reflects significant distinctions in the calculation of attorney's fees…

Pyszka, Kessler, et al. v. Mullin

We granted her motion and remanded the cause to the trial court. Chertoff v. Chertoff, 553 So.2d 179 (Fla. 3d…