From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cherry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 2, 2022
334 So. 3d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2450

03-02-2022

Albert G. CHERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Robert J. Slama of Robert J. Slama, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Robert J. Slama of Robert J. Slama, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Lewis, M.K. Thomas, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cherry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 2, 2022
334 So. 3d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Cherry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Albert G. CHERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

334 So. 3d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)