From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatman v. Miller

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Nov 9, 2005
CIVIL ACTION NO: 05-1481, SECTION: "D" (1) (E.D. La. Nov. 9, 2005)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO: 05-1481, SECTION: "D" (1).

November 9, 2005


ORDER, REASONS AND JUDGMENT


After considering the § 2254 Petition filed by Leroy Chatman, the State's Response, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 8), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9), the Court approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion regarding Petitioner's claims that he was entrapped, his sentence was excessive, and he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

Further, regarding Petitioner's claim that "the evidence was insufficient to convict him because the State's evidence was discredited by the video of the transaction," the court finds that Petitioner has failed to make any showing of particularity to support such a claim. Finally, to the extent that Petitioner is attempting to amend his § 2254 Petition, through his Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to make a claim that there was insufficient evidence that his cocaine distribution took place within 1000 feet of a school, the court finds that Petitioner has failed to present such a claim to the Louisiana Supreme Court, and thus he has failed to exhaust his remedies available in the courts of the State. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b) (1) (A). Accordingly;

Petitioner's Memorandum in Support of his § 2254 Petition, Doc. No. 1, p. 4.

Petitioner has exhausted his remedies in state court on his insufficiency claims that State's evidence was discredited by the video of the transaction and he was entrapped. The record reflects that, prior to the filing of his Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner has not raised the "1000 feet" issue.

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the § 2254 Petition of Leroy Chatman for federal habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, to the extent that Petitioner is claiming that he was entrapped, his sentence was excessive, he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and the evidence was insufficient to convict him because the State's evidence was discredited by the video of the transaction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, to the extent Petitioner has amended his § 2254 Petition by claiming (through his objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation) that there was insufficient evidence that his cocaine distribution took place within 1000 feet of a school, the Amended Petition of Leroy Chatman for federal habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust his state-court remedies.

Whether or not Petitioner attempts to exhaust his state-court remedies on his claim that there was insufficient evidence that his cocaine distribution took place within 1000 feet of a school, this court makes no comment on whether or not such a claim would be timely.


Summaries of

Chatman v. Miller

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Nov 9, 2005
CIVIL ACTION NO: 05-1481, SECTION: "D" (1) (E.D. La. Nov. 9, 2005)
Case details for

Chatman v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:LEROY CHATMAN v. JAMES D. MILLER, JR., ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Nov 9, 2005

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO: 05-1481, SECTION: "D" (1) (E.D. La. Nov. 9, 2005)

Citing Cases

Mathieu v. Tanner

As a federal issue considered under the AEDPA standard, an excessive sentence claim presents a question of…

Marcel v. Vannoy

As a federal issue considered under the AEDPA standard, an excessive sentence claim presents a question of…