From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatelain v. American Can Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Sep 15, 1980
387 So. 2d 670 (La. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 10984.

July 10, 1980. Rehearing Denied September 15, 1980.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE THOMAS A. EARLY, JR., J.

Coleman T. Organ, Organ Meyer, New Orleans, for plaintiff.

John E. Jackson, Baldwin J. Allen, John E. Jackson, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant.

Before REDMANN, GULOTTA and GARRISON, JJ.


Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal, on exception of no cause of action, of his suit against his corporate employer for damages, alleging that noise at his employment caused him a partial hearing loss and hypersensitivity to loud noises.

Accepting plaintiff's petition's allegations as true, his petition would state a cause of action for workers' compensation and it might therefore be argued that the judgment appealed from is not wholly correct. However, the context is that plaintiff has already tried and lost a suit for workers' compensation, 344 So.2d 1180, this court finding that he did not prove his hearing problems were caused by his work environment. Thus, insofar as the petition is viewed as stating a cause of action for workers' compensation, defendant's exception of res judicata would require its dismissal. And, to the extent that plaintiff seeks any recovery other than workers' compensation, he does not state a cause of action because of the exclusivity of workers' compensation, R.S. 23:1032.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Chatelain v. American Can Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Sep 15, 1980
387 So. 2d 670 (La. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Chatelain v. American Can Company

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE S. CHATELAIN v. AMERICAN CAN COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 15, 1980

Citations

387 So. 2d 670 (La. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

O'Regan v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc.

The distinction between a claim for disease or injury not covered by the act, in which case a tort recovery…

LeBlanc v. Consolidated Aluminum Co.

While plaintiff's disability may increase or decrease, the causation of his disability has already been…