From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chance v. California

U.S.
Nov 6, 1967
389 U.S. 89 (1967)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO.

No. 306, Misc.

Decided November 6, 1967.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Marshall W. Krause for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Michael J. Phelan, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.


The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.


Summaries of

Chance v. California

U.S.
Nov 6, 1967
389 U.S. 89 (1967)
Case details for

Chance v. California

Case Details

Full title:CHANCE v . CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 6, 1967

Citations

389 U.S. 89 (1967)

Citing Cases

United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc.

309. Cases Involving State Statutes: Bloss v. Dykema, 1970, 398 U.S. 278, 90 S.Ct. 1727, 26 L.Ed.2d 230;…

United States v. Groner

initely more tasteful, if such an adjective can be allowed in this area of the law. Burgin v. South Carolina,…