From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chamberlain v. Reed

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1860
16 Cal. 207 (Cal. 1860)

Opinion


16 Cal. 207 CHAMBERLAIN v. REED et al. Supreme Court of California July, 1860

         Appeal from the Seventh District.

         JUDGES: Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Field, C. J. concurring.

         OPINION

         COPE, Judge

         Where an appeal regularly taken is dismissed for want of prosecution, the dismissal operates as an affirmance of the judgment, and a second appeal cannot be allowed. The only mode of avoiding the consequences of such dismissal is to move, during the term or before the remittitur has gone out, to vacate the order and reinstate the cause.

         The appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

         See Karth v. Light (15 Cal. 324 ).


Summaries of

Chamberlain v. Reed

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1860
16 Cal. 207 (Cal. 1860)
Case details for

Chamberlain v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:CHAMBERLAIN v. REED et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1860

Citations

16 Cal. 207 (Cal. 1860)

Citing Cases

Waugenheim v. Graham

First --The dismissal of the appeal from the judgment for want of prosecution operates as an affirmance of…

People v. Cantrell

The assertion is completely unsupported, and appellant does not, nor could he, attempt to reinstate the…